Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Removing Objectivity, Part 1



In conversations with TBM’s it is very hard to gain an acceptance of the legitimacy of your position. This can be especially frustrating because in every sense of the word, your argument is built upon a foundation of reason. Were these discussions simply an internet fight with a faceless screen name, it wouldn't be that important. Most of the time, however, these discussions are taking place with someone much closer to us, be it a spouse, parent, or sibling, and the fallout from such conversations can be quite damaging.

It is oft said that you can’t reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into. This is a very valid statement, and the truthfulness of it has caused me to spend considerable time attempting to figure out how to get someone to apply their critical thinking skills into an argument that they are emotionally vested in.

After all, I was able to do it. I was about as deep into the rabbit hole as one can be, with absolutely no question in my mind that I was right. Sure, there were some issues I was concerned or curious about, but in the end I truly believed that they would be resolved in the next life, which I was certain was going to happen. In fact, one of the greatest lamentations of my youth was my total commitment to the idea that the second coming would happen soon (right about now, in fact) and that I probably wouldn't get to raise a family before the shit hit the fan. Yet, somehow, I was able to progress from this sort of thinking into a reasoned, objective analysis into my faith, with the eventual complete acceptance that I was completely and utterly wrong. How did I get there?

My dear wife was able to do it as well.  I was completely out for quite a while before I even broached the subject with her. As I alluded to above, I was quite worried what would happen after attempting to tell my wife about my new-founded lack of religious belief. I had the full expectation that she would divorce me, and I spent months on a carefully crafted letter explaining my position. But would she even be open to it, be able to listen to the words and my reasoning?

First, I tested the waters with a softball. Even as a TBM I didn't think there was a world-wide flood. I took the fence-sitter position that it was a regional flood (even though it clearly says it wasn't . After collecting some good analytic info about why a world flood wasn't possible, I brought the subject up on a drive home. Immediately the walls went up. She tightened her lips, her nostrils flared, and her eyes widened in anger. “I don’t care what anyone says, I’m not going to question my faith!”

Exactly the type of response I was trying to avoid. The idea that someone would never change their position despite any information that could be presented is about as arrogant and willfully ignorant a position as there is. Now, that is not to say my wife is this way, as this type of response is normal when emotions get involved. But it shouldn't be.

That hard response took me back. I had no idea how I was going to reason with someone so emotionally charged that they couldn't question something that isn't even critical to their faith, especially when there is a commonly-accepted middle of the road concession available. But I was intent on this path, so I didn't quit just yet.

It took me several months to transition from total believer to non believer, so I realized that my expectation that she would just be a pure logic machine and drop her life-long faith after inducing the truth from a single conversation to be…well, unrealistic at best.

I tried several more approaches, but used a little more tact. My goal was no longer to get an instant deconversion, but simply to get her to think about our conversation and the logical repercussions of them.  The last one I dropped on her before she received “the bomb” (my long-ass letter) as a probing about the temple. Again, I related it back to her and her feelings, and not so much about facts or controversy.
When we went through the temple together to receive our endowments, I was in shock the whole time. The rituals, the clothing, the fact that we obeyed Satan, the chanting, overall, the general creepiness of the whole thing really bothered me. However, she and I had never talked about the experience. After all, we weren't supposed to.  One thing that had bothered me for a while is that I forgot my secret, heavenly name. How am I supposed to get into heaven past the guardian angels if I don’t even know my own name?

As many of you know, the hilarious thing about your magic heaven name is that only a few names are used, they are rotated, and everybody that goes through on the same day has the same name. I asked her what hers was and told her I had forgotten mine (turns out she forgot hers too). I then explained how everyone had the same name and that I could find out my name by just looking it up in a database by date, finding out the name that everyone that was endowed that day got. It is a little thing, but as I showed her this it was clear that it bothered her.

We are taught that this name is our heavenly name, that it is sacred and secret; being the name we will be known by in the next life. When she (and I) found out that name isn't so special, it really takes some of the “mmmph” out of the significance of the day. She revealed to me that she was just as creeped out as I was by the ceremony, that she did not find it uplifting at all, and that there is a strange order involved here. The names are a little fuzzy as to what the full purpose is, but if we are pre-ordained for our roles in this life, the family we were born into, then this means that in the infinite wisdom of God, all of the people who were given a certain name in the temple will magically be there on the same day.

Seeing the cogs turning in her head, I decided to move a little further. See, she was still responding emotionally for the most part, but this was information that didn't directly conflict with any belief she had and was involving an issue integral to the faith, yet was something she didn't think fondly of. Perfect. I decided to bring up polygamy.

As a member this issue didn't bother me too greatly. Like many, I never learned anything about it except for the most general of information. The fact that I knew Joseph Smith had multiple wives might even put me ahead of most Mormons (for some reason, many are completely unaware of this). I used the information on the church-owned website FamilySearch.org to show her just how many wives Smith had, when he married them, and that many of them were quite young. I also demonstrated that many of those wives were concurrently married to other guys, but I did all of this with an approach that was not too critical or too condemning. I also didn't overwhelm her with information. I gave her a small taste and let her stew on it for a while, and wouldn't you know it only a few days passed before she was asking me for more information. It wasn't much longer before she was all the way out, and I knew my marriage was safe.

To be continued…

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

About

The power of the written word has shaped our world. In the beginning, alphabets and reading aloud the written word were considered a form of magic by many. Particularly with those words that are reported to be of divine origins, few technologies have been considered so threatening or caused such division as the invention of writing. Every continent has seen the burning of books (and people) for the ideas they contained. In Great Britain, many were burned alive for the grievous sin of wanting to read their Bible in their own language.

With this in mind I begin an undertaking that few up to this point in history ever had the opportunity to do. I intend to read as many of the sacred texts as I can (roughly one every week or two) and provide my analysis and commentary as I go. All from the Baha'i, the Druids, and the Jains will be represented.